What position(s) have you held in the legislative branch?
Legislative Assistant on the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. I worked under Ranking Member Sarbanes from July 2005 through December 2006 and for Chairman Dodd from January 2007 until June 2007.
What was your career path prior to obtaining your position?
I worked on the Kerry campaign for a few months, and I spent a few months working for a political consultant. I enjoyed both but I wanted to do something more substantive.
Why did you choose to take a position in the legislative branch?
I wanted to do something substantive and policy-related, and I wanted to work for a Member who focused on issues of economic justice.
What were your primary responsibilities?
Supporting senior staff through research on committee portfolio. This included banking and consumer credit law, privacy, data breach, private student lending, monetary policy, international finance, money laundering, and terrorism finance.
Are there skills or knowledge that you found particularly valuable in your position?
To do well on the Hill, you need an ability to juggle various assignments at once and know how to best prioritize those assignments. In my case, I was working for various senior staff. I also think that for my position – which involved editing memos, floor statements, legislation, etc. – an attention to detail is crucial.
Can you give a brief overview of the process you went through to secure your job?
It was a pretty extensive interviewing process. I heard about the position through a friend who used to work on the Hill – she thought it would be a good fit for me. When the position opened up, I sent my materials to the legislative assistant who I ultimately succeeded.
Do you have any advice on navigating the job application process?
I think prior Hill experience helps a lot. Fortunately for me, I had interned on the Hill during college in two capacities (as an intern for Senator Stabenow in her D.C. office and for Senator Boxer in her San Francisco office). I think setting up informational interviews can help (e.g., through friends of friends), because that person will have you in mind should he/she spot an opening. As with any position, it is good to have some point of contact.
It is important to keep an open mind, but, nonetheless, to make sure you are true to your ideological posture. When you work on the Hill, you are inevitably going to be working for a political figure, and I think it is a much more satisfying experience if that political figure shares a similar ideology as you. At the same time, it is important to keep an open mind in other areas. For example, you might want to work for a more senior member of the Senate, but if you are working for a more junior member of the House, you may be afforded more responsibility early on, and that is much more important than obtaining a senior position in a senior body.
As far as mechanics, first, you have to figure out what position you want – do you want to work in the press shop? On legislative issues? Then, you can look in the Senate Bulletin (posted online), and the House has one available as well. Oftentimes these postings won’t identify who the member is. They usually indicate what region the Member represents – a lot of times it helps if you are from that region. Members are generally more inclined to hire people from their own districts and/or own states. Finally, when you apply to jobs on the Hill, you may have to apply for a lot of jobs – there is a high demand for Hill jobs – at all levels.
Are there positions that you noticed in the legislative branch that had a particularly legal bent?
Most clearly, counsel for a Committee or a personal office. Counsels on my Committee had non-legal duties as well (e.g. drafting hearing statements, floor statements, meeting with various interest groups, the administration, advocacy groups). The legal aspects of a counsel’s position include drafting legislation and drafting amendments.
Did the majority of your colleagues complete post-graduate work?
There are a lot of law graduates on the Hill. Most of the senior staff on my Committee were attorneys. Almost everyone on my staff had some kind of graduate degree.
Is there a hierarchy of positions based on your level of experience on the Hill?
Post-graduate degrees will get you through the door. Once you’re on the Hill, moving up will depend on timing, and how well you do on the Hill. A lot of times, vertical moves within an office are based on political swings, whether it be retirement of members or changeover of who has the majority. So, some of it is out of your control. Let’s say there’s a legislative assistant who covers health care and staffs her Member on the HELP Committee; say that Member moves up to be Chairman of the HELP Committee due to retirement of members and changeover of the majority – that legislative assistant might very well become the staff director of the HELP Committee.
Is Hill experience or professional experience more valued by Congressional offices and committees?
Both are important. Also issue area experience is valued. If you are looking for a position on the Finance Committee, and you worked for a tax or trade think tank or NGO, that is obviously going to help you, because that Committee’s jurisdiction focuses on tax and trade. Hill experience, educational background, professional experience, and regional ties are the four factors that will probably help you the most in securing a Hill job. It’s also a lot about luck. Making a connection with who interviews you (i.e., maybe you went to the same undergraduate university), as with any position, helps tremendously.
Are there any certain courses or legal experience that you think would be helpful to a legislative branch applicant?
To be honest, I don’t know if employers on the Hill look at course selection, but I would imagine a legislative drafting course, a statutory interpretation class (e.g. Legislation) or a statutory-based course that centers on an area of expertise that the Committee/Member has in its/her portfolio (e.g., take Immigration if you are seeking a position on the Judiciary Committee).
Is there something law students and graduates could be doing in their current careers (or with their summers) to help secure one of these positions, especially if they do not have experience on Capitol Hill?
Intern on the Hill. If you are out of law school, working in the public sector may help, because a Hill employer might want to make sure that a candidate is financially ready to work in the public sector. Also, volunteering for a Member’s campaign would be helpful, because it would allow you to meet people who work in that Member’s office or are affiliated with the candidate.
How important are Hill contacts to the process? Do you have any advice on how to expand one's network of contacts?
This is especially important on the Hill, because if you have a contact, you might be the first to hear about a position. You might end up getting an explicit or implicit endorsement of that staff member. The Hill is driven by people. You have people (i.e., staffers) working for people (i.e., Members) who are working for people (i.e., constituents). So, having your resume passed on by someone may be even more helpful than having spectacular grades or the ideal work experience.
In terms of making contacts, it really helps to live in D.C., simply because you meet Hill staffers all the time (through work, socially). But you have to be careful when making new contacts: you don’t want to give them the impression that you are only interested in them because they work on the Hill. I have definitely gotten that impression.
Do you have any advice on next steps for those who don’t secure a position, at least initially, with a member of Congress or a Committee?
Just keep trying. A lot of this has to do with timing, luck, who happens to see your resume, and who you happen to interview with. A lot of times it takes people a year to find a Hill job, and sometimes it takes people a week. If you are not getting a lot of bites, try sending your resume to contacts on the Hill to see if there is anything you can include or exclude – Hill staffers generally have a good idea about what stands out on resumes.
Interviewed by Whitney Price, 2L. Photograph by Whitney Price.